Curare | Zeitschrift für Medizinethnologie | Journal of Medical Anthropology
Curare is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal of medical anthropology published by the AGEM – Arbeitsgemeinschaft Ethnologie und Medizin (Association for Anthropology and Medicine) since 1978. Articles are published in German & English. The transformation into an open access journal took place in 2024 with the support of the German Research Foundation (DFG), a print version continues to be published by Reimer Verlag Berlin. All issues from 2018 are published online at www.curarejournal.org. Issues from 1978 to 2017 are freely accessible on the digitalization server of the FID SKA – Specialized Information Service Social and Cultural Anthropology and available at www.evifa.de/curare-journal.
Call for Papers – Curare Abortion and Miscarriage: Narratives, Practices, Discourses (Special Issue)
(Guest Editor: Dr. Florian Lützelberger, Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg/University of Oxford)
In La condition fœtale(2004), Luc Boltanski describes the profound ambivalence that shapes cultural and social modes of engaging with the foetus: it appears at once as an invisible medical object, as a projection surface for social expectations, as a legally regulated life in the making, and as an intimate secret. This simultaneity of the visible and the invisible, the private and the political, embodied experience and social attribution, profoundly structures the narratives and practices surrounding abortion and miscarriage. The foetus thus emerges not only as a borderline case of individual experience but also as a paradigmatic object of biopolitical regulation in the Foucauldian sense: it condenses discourses that seek to govern life, bodies, and populations, thereby establishing normative orders of sexuality and reproduction. At the same time, a contested field opens up in which different publics and counterpublics intersect. While legal and medical discourses seek to capture the foetus within norms and categories, autobiographical, literary, or artistic representations generate spaces that elude hegemonial logic. In this respect, many narratives of abortion and miscarriage can also be understood as forms of what Lauren Berlant (2008) has termed counterpublics: communicative arenas in which marginalised experiences are articulated and positioned against dominant moral and political orders. Abortion and pregnancy loss thus appear not only as medico-legal issues or individual fates but as crucial sites where conflicts over visibility, recognition, and interpretive authority with regard to the childbearing body become condensed.
Contemporary debates underscore the urgency of the subject: the overturning of Roe v. Wade in the United States, the enshrinement of the right to abortion in the French Constitution in 2023, as well as ongoing controversies concerning the personhood of the embryo and the regulation of reproduction. Yet the field is shaped not only by juridical and political disputes but also by literary, artistic, and autobiographical testimony. Perhaps the most prominent example is Annie Ernaux’s L’événement (2000), which has become a central document of feminist literary history. Ernaux’s text demonstrates paradigmatically how literary language renders visible both the lived experience of abortion and its social condemnation, while simultaneously highlighting the individuality and subjectivity of such experiences.
The planned special issue seeks to examine the interferences and tensions between body, medicine, law, ethics, society, and subjectivity in relation to abortion and miscarriage, while taking into account a wide range of temporal, cultural, and social contexts. This issue positions itself as a platform for interdisciplinary dialogue that takes seriously both the long medical-historical and anthropological dimensions of abortion and miscarriage and their contemporary literary, artistic, and political articulations. Its aim is to open up a wide panorama of approaches that makes visible the intersections of body, knowledge, norms, practices, and lived experience within this highly sensitive field.
We invite contributions from all relevant disciplines, including social and cultural anthropology, empirical cultural studies, history of medicine, media studies, sociology, midwifery studies, medicine, law, history, literary and cultural studies, art history, film studies, philosophy and ethics, gender studies, and the medical and health humanities. Interdisciplinary approaches are particularly welcome.
For more information please visit our Call for Papers site.
Online First
2025
- William Dawley, Annelin Eriksen & Sigrid Torsnes. Cryonics 2.0. From Immortalism to Indefinite Lifespan (soon)
- Wolfgang Bichmann, Walter Bruchhausen, Dieter Hampel, Michael Heidegger, Albrecht Jahn & Oliver Razum, Wolfgang Krahl, Pitt Reitmaier, Susan B. Rifkin, Ekkehard Schroeder & Stefan Schubert. Ein bedeutender Forscher, Lehrer und Ideengeber. Nachruf einiger Weggefährt*innen auf Hans-Jochen Diesfeld (1932–2025)
- Tobias Becker. Medien und Medizin als Ressourcen füreinander Polio-Schluckimpfung im BRD-Fernsehen der 1960er- und 70er-Jahre
Current Issue
48 (2024) 1+2
Thematic Focus: Gender und Medicine
Edited by Barbara Wittmann & Alena Mathis
The thematic focus “Gender and Medicine” of this Curare issue explores historically shaped and enduring gender imbalances within our medical structures and their influence on our everyday interactions. The assembled articles draw on insights from critical feminist initiatives and the women’s health movement. They ask why people develop different illnesses depending on gender and how these illnesses are dealt with on the basis of specific socio-cultural influences. These contributions trace historical developments and, build-ing on this, they examine current conditions of gender-related power relations. The term ‘gender medicine’ is intended to help bring marginalised perspectives into focus in order to overcome the view of the cis-male body as the medical-pharma-ceutical norm, and to develop a new way to understand and respond to health inequities in clinical care and health services delivery. The articles also reflect (self-)critically on the Eurocentric narrowing of perspectives in order to shed light on the colonial effects of ‘medical expansion,’ effects which have hardly been addressed to date. As the critical contributions in this issue show, ‘gender medicine’ is still a utopia or a ‘non-space’ in many parts of the medical profession. In the ab-sence of a place where medicine is practised in the way the authors and research partners would like to see it, we at Curare are glad to provide at least a space for reflection. We hope that the contribu-tions will help to initiate the further development of medicine towards a more inclusive and equitable project.

